Archived funding opportunity

This document has been archived. The latest version is NSF 24-572.

NSF 04-519: Foundations of Computing Processes and Artifacts

Program Solicitation

Document Information

Document History

  • Posted: November 24, 2003
  • Replaced by: NSF 05-576

Foundations of Computing Processes and Artifacts (CPA)

Program Solicitation
NSF 04-519

NSF Logo

National Science Foundation
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering
      Division of Computing & Communication Foundations



Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):

    March 02, 2004

Summary Of Program Requirements

General Information

Program Title:

Foundations of Computing Processes and Artifacts (CPA)

Synopsis of Program:

The CPA cluster supports research and education projects to advance formalisms and methodologies pertaining to the artifacts and processes for building computing and communication systems. Computational artifacts range from formalisms, models, theories and languages to hardware/software architectures, technology components and a variety of physical manifestations of implementations. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation will address the nature of such artifacts and the computational processes they perform, as well as the artifacts and processes involved in specifying, designing, building and using them.

Areas of interest include: topics in software engineering such as software design methodologies, tools for software testing, analysis, synthesis, and verification; semantics, design, and implementation of programming languages; software systems and tools for reliable and high performance computing; computer architectures including memory and I/O subsystems, micro-architectural techniques, and application-specific architectures; system-on-a-chip; performance metrics and evaluation tools; VLSI electronic design and pertinent analysis, synthesis and simulation algorithms; architecture and design for mixed media or future media (e.g., MEMs and nanotechnology); computer graphics and visualization techniques.

Cognizant Program Officer(s):

  • Sankar Basu, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: sabasu@nsf.gov

  • Sol Greenspan, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: sgreensp@nsf.gov

  • John Staudhammer, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: jstaudha@nsf.gov

  • Peter Varman, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: pvarman@nsf.gov

  • Xiaodong Zhang, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1122 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: xzhang@nsf.gov

  • Laurin A. Battle, Office Automation Clerk, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1160 N, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: lbattle@nsf.gov

Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):

  • 47.070 --- Computer and Information Science and Engineering

Eligibility Information

  • Organization Limit: None Specified.
  • PI Eligibility Limit: None Specified.
  • Limit on Number of Proposals: None Specified.

Award Information

  • Anticipated Type of Award: Standard or Continuing Grant
  • Estimated Number of Awards: 100 to 120 - with an average award size of $125,000/year for up to three years
  • Anticipated Funding Amount: $37,000,000 dependent on availability of funds

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions

A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
  • Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: Standard GPG Guidelines apply.
B. Budgetary Information
  • Cost Sharing Requirements: Cost Sharing is not required.
  • Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: Not Applicable.
  • Other Budgetary Limitations: Not Applicable.
C. Due Dates
  • Full Proposal Deadline Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
    • March 02, 2004

Proposal Review Information

  • Merit Review Criteria: National Science Board approved criteria apply.

Award Administration Information

  • Award Conditions: Standard NSF award conditions apply.
  • Reporting Requirements: Standard NSF reporting requirements apply.

I. Introduction

The CPA cluster supports research and education projects to advance formalisms and methodologies pertaining to the artifacts and processes for building computing and communication systems. Computational artifacts range from formalisms, models, theories and languages to hardware/software architectures, technology components and a variety of physical manifestations of implementations. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation will address the nature of such artifacts and the computational processes they perform, as well as the artifacts and processes involved in specifying, designing, building and using them.

Areas of interest include: topics in software engineering such as software design methodologies, tools for software testing, analysis, synthesis, and verification; semantics, design, and implementation of programming languages; software systems and tools for reliable and high performance computing; computer architectures including memory and I/O subsystems, micro-architectural techniques, and application-specific architectures; system-on-a-chip; performance metrics and evaluation tools; VLSI electronic design and pertinent analysis, synthesis and simulation algorithms; architecture and design for mixed media or future media (e.g., MEMs and nanotechnology); computer graphics and visualization techniques.

II. Program Description

The CPA cluster solicits proposals that are typically novel software and/or hardware implementations of algorithms or are methods and tools for the design and implementation of software and/or hardware systems. Novel architectures and their simulation and design principles are also addressed. The CPA cluster emphasizes integration of research and education in all areas of interest. Principal investigators can range from faculty members beginning their careers to teams of senior investigators working on novel directions within a multi-disciplinary mode.  Collaborations between computer scientists, engineers, and other disciplinary scientists are welcomed because they have the potential to strengthen the foundations of computing processes and artifacts.

While each area described below deals with a set of specific topics internal to the subfield of interest, research issues inevitably spill over artificially imposed programmatic boundaries. The CPA cluster encourages proposals that transcend the confines of each of the sub-areas elaborated.

Software design and productivity

This sub-area sponsors integrated research and education projects to advance scientific foundations, engineering practice and education in the areas of programming languages, compilers, and the design and production of software. Relevant projects may concern any of the artifacts involved in software engineering, including programming languages, and/or the processes involved in the development, evolution and management of these artifacts.  Research on the relatively young field of software design science is also needed to develop a better scientific understanding and foundation for engineering practice. Software is a subject of its own with a need for theories, models, principles, formal methods and empirical investigations.

Specific topics of interest include: constructive methods for software design and evolution; issues of software modularity, composition and architectures; enhancement of confidence and quality; tools and environments supporting automation of activities of software development, including model-driven development, software understanding, maintenance and evolution; notations, theories, models and techniques for constructing and reasoning about descriptions for all activities of software engineering; requirements engineering; the application of representation, reasoning and problem-solving approaches from artificial intelligence to software development activities and artifacts; contributions from human-computer interaction, cognitive science and social science to software development, evolution, management and use; programming language design and implementation; general-purpose, domain-specific and special-purpose languages; compilers for all classes of programming languages, including issues of memory management and optimization for multiple critical resources; integration of programming languages with other software engineering artifacts, processes and capabilities, such as specifications, formal methods, analysis tools, proofs, architectures, and traceability.

High-end software, architecture and design

This sub-area sponsors integrated research and education projects in software and/or hardware necessary to achieve efficient, flexible, reliable, and robust high-performance computing in traditional and non-traditional high performance system environments.  Progress will depend upon advances in electronics design and design tools, architectures for a broad spectrum of hardware systems, and software and software tools for effective use of the system. 

Virtually all fields of science and engineering depend on the computational power and efficiency that could potentially be enabled by breakthroughs in computer architecture and parallelization. Present parallel hardware, software, and algorithms do not scale to meet the demands of contemporary cutting-edge scientific research.  With limited advances made over the last decade, there is a compelling need to stimulate research in promising new parallel architectures and associated algorithms and software for computation.  Additionally, computer architectures must provide enhanced functionality and performance necessary to meet the demands of diverse applications, including support for real-time computation, mobility, security,  fault-detection and recovery, dynamic adaptation, and self-tuning, while meeting stringent constraints on power-consumption, size, cost, complexity, and programmability.

At an even more fundamental level, design methodologies for VLSI are challenged by the rapid advances in deep submicron, mechanical (MEMS), optical, nano, and quantum computing media. Therefore, the intent of this cluster is also to support basic research underlying the science and methodologies for designing integrated systems comprised of micro systems in traditional silicon VLSI technology, in MEMS technologies, and in computing media of the future.

Looking farther out, an emphasis on molecular architectures seeks to engage researchers and educators in systematizing the design of nano-scale artifacts (in conjunction with NSF’s Nanoscale Science and Engineering priority area). Methodologies such as imposing an “architecture,” and using multiple layers of abstraction—often with different mathematical models, languages and formalisms—to represent component interactions at different levels, is necessary for analysis and synthesis of complex nano-scale systems, and has been typical of the discipline of computer science. Universal models must be invented to capture the architecture of molecular artifacts in general. Another challenge is to exploit their inherent massive parallelism, when specialized for computing or communication applications.

Topics of interests include:

  • Software systems and tools for dynamic and adaptive computation to provide run-time support for dynamic compilation and optimization; compilers and infrastructure for optimizing compilers for multiple platforms; software support for job scheduling and resource management; issues of security and reliability of high performance computing in clusters and grids; management of large-scale distributed data for high performance applications; architectures for high-end computing to achieve higher user productivity and higher sustained performance in complex science and engineering applications.
  • High-level synthesis, design, and simulation of complex systems, including infrastructure and tools for simulation and evaluation of devices and architectures; next-generation architectures (e.g., billion-transistor architectures), chip multiprocessors and networks-on-chip;  novel applications of multithreading; exploiting parallelism at multiple levels (e.g., instruction, data, thread, stream and task  levels); microarchitecture, memory systems, interconnection networks; and multi-objective optimizations (e.g., power, reliability, complexity and security); reconfigurable computing and application-specific processors and dedicated hardware; I/O and storage architectures; clusters; fault tolerance; benchmarks and performance evaluation methodologies; technology issues.
  • Exploration of fundamental questions of how to design in future computing media: stimulating crossover activities between electronic design automation researchers and micro/nano/molecular technology researchers; investigating design methods for technologies such as optical, MEMS and mixed signal; meeting challenges of design in VLSI silicon as geometries shrink; basic science for design for next generation VLSI chips using deep submicron technologies, including physical design (routing & layout, power optimization, logic synthesis, on chip communication, modeling & device simulation), system-level design (systems on chips, embedded systems, application specific processor design, hardware software co-design), and test and verification (testing of analog, digital mixed signal systems, built-in self test, design for testability, formal proof of correctness).

Computer graphics and visualization

This sub-area sponsors integrated research and education projects in visual information transfer, addressing modeling of physical events, mechanisms for image production, and the use of images for representing and exploring non-visual information such as computer system performance, large volumes of data, and specific application domains. This will inform understanding of the forms of imaging that can most conveniently transfer particular types of information, ultimately involving adaptation of criteria to individual observers, especially partially-sighted, or vision-limited users. While current imaging graphics, based on assembling images from parts of a 3D structure or on volume rendering, ultimately produces a 3D display on a flat surface, or a pair for stereo rendering, the next major step in realistic immersive graphics will be the development of 3D displays, likely to be holographic color devices or practical auto-stereoscopic displays. Research is encouraged for exploring the systems aspects (requirements, efficacy and costs) of these devices, especially the auto-stereoscopic devices.

Research on high performance graphics and visualization will potentially benefit from both the software and the hardware aspects of the topics described above. Work on experimental implementations is considered appropriate when it is integral part of the research.  Innovative applications of computational and graphic techniques to science and engineering applications are also welcome. 

III. Eligibility Information

The categories of proposers identified in the Grant Proposal Guide are eligible to submit proposals under this program announcement/solicitation.

IV. Award Information

Estimated program budget, number of awards and average award size/duration are subject to the availability of funds.

V. Proposal Preparation And Submission Instructions

A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

Full Proposal Instructions:

Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement/solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF Website at: https://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpg. Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.

Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement/solicitation number (04-519) in the program announcement/solicitation block on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.

B. Budgetary Information

Cost Sharing:

Cost sharing is not required in proposals submitted under this Program Solicitation.

C. Due Dates

Proposals must be submitted by the following date(s):

Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):

    March 02, 2004

D. FastLane Requirements

Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this announcement/solicitation through the FastLane system. Detailed instructions for proposal preparation and submission via FastLane are available at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program announcement/solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this announcement/solicitation.

Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications). The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Proposers are no longer required to provide a paper copy of the signed Proposal Cover Sheet to NSF. Further instructions regarding this process are available on the FastLane Website at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov

VI. Proposal Review Information

A. NSF Proposal Review Process

Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest, at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority-serving institutions, or adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal.

The National Science Board approved revised criteria for evaluating proposals at its meeting on March 28, 1997 (NSB 97-72). All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.

On July 8, 2002, the NSF Director issued Important Notice 127, Implementation of new Grant Proposal Guide Requirements Related to the Broader Impacts Criterion. This Important Notice reinforces the importance of addressing both criteria in the preparation and review of all proposals submitted to NSF. NSF continues to strengthen its internal processes to ensure that both of the merit review criteria are addressed when making funding decisions.

In an effort to increase compliance with these requirements, the January 2002 issuance of the GPG incorporated revised proposal preparation guidelines relating to the development of the Project Summary and Project Description. Chapter II of the GPG specifies that Principal Investigators (PIs) must address both merit review criteria in separate statements within the one-page Project Summary. This chapter also reiterates that broader impacts resulting from the proposed project must be addressed in the Project Description and described as an integral part of the narrative.

Effective October 1, 2002, NSF will return without review proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria within the Project Summary. It is believed that these changes to NSF proposal preparation and processing guidelines will more clearly articulate the importance of broader impacts to NSF-funded projects.

The two National Science Board approved merit review criteria are listed below (see the Grant Proposal Guide Chapter III.A for further information). The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which he/she is qualified to make judgments.

    What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
    How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
    What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
    How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?

NSF staff will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions:

    Integration of Research and Education
    One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives.
    Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
    Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

B. Review Protocol and Associated Customer Service Standard

All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal. Proposals submitted in response to this announcement/solicitation will be reviewed by Ad Hoc and/or panel review.

Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.

A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Director. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.

NSF is striving to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on the date of receipt. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation.

In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.

VII. Award Administration Information

A. Notification of the Award

Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program Division administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See section VI.A. for additional information on the review process.)

B. Award Conditions

An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (NSF-GC-1); * or Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Terms and Conditions * and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative agreement awards also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions (CA-1). Electronic mail notification is the preferred way to transmit NSF awards to organizations that have electronic mail capabilities and have requested such notification from the Division of Grants and Agreements.

*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/home/grants/grants_gac.htm. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.

More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in the NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpm. The GPM is also for sale through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402. The telephone number at GPO for subscription information is (202) 512-1800. The GPM may be ordered through the GPO Website at http://www.gpo.gov.

C. Reporting Requirements

For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.

Within 90 days after the expiration of an award, the PI also is required to submit a final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for the PI and all Co-PIs. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.

PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project reporting system, available through FastLane, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. This system permits electronic submission and updating of project reports, including information on project participants (individual and organizational), activities and findings, publications, and other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system.

VIII. Contacts For Additional Information

General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:

  • Sankar Basu, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: sabasu@nsf.gov

  • Sol Greenspan, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: sgreensp@nsf.gov

  • John Staudhammer, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: jstaudha@nsf.gov

  • Peter Varman, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1145 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: pvarman@nsf.gov

  • Xiaodong Zhang, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1122 S, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: xzhang@nsf.gov

  • Laurin A. Battle, Office Automation Clerk, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1160 N, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: lbattle@nsf.gov

For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact:

  • Tracey M. Wilkinson, Senior Program Assistant, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, Division of Computing and Communication Foundations, 1175 N, telephone: (703) 292-8910, fax: (703) 292-9059, email: twilkins@nsf.gov

IX. Other Programs Of Interest

The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research and education in science, mathematics, and engineering. The NSF Guide to Programs is available electronically at https://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp. General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information for proposal submission are provided in each chapter.

Many NSF programs offer announcements or solicitations concerning specific proposal requirements. To obtain additional information about these requirements, contact the appropriate NSF program offices. Any changes in NSF's fiscal year programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs will be announced in the NSF E-Bulletin, which is updated daily on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin, and in individual program announcements/solicitations. Subscribers can also sign up for NSF's Custom News Service (https://www.nsf.gov/home/cns/start.htm) to be notified of new funding opportunities that become available.

About The National Science Foundation

The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. Awardees are wholly responsible for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or their interpretation.

NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities and persons with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and NSF policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF, although some programs may have special requirements that limit eligibility.

Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the GPG Chapter II, Section D.2 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.

Privacy Act And Public Burden Statements

The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, Division of Administrative Services, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230.

OMB control number: 3145-0058.