NSF 10-587: Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology (PRFB)
Program Solicitation
Document Information
Document History
- Posted: July 19, 2010
- Replaces: NSF 09-573
- Replaced by: NSF 11-499
Program Solicitation NSF 10-587
Replaces Document(s):
NSF 09-573
 |
National Science Foundation |
Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
October 19, 2010
October 11, 2011
Second Tuesday in October, Annually Thereafter
Important Information And Revision Notes
Announces a new competitive area 2, Intersections of Biology and Math and Physical Sciences. Competitive area 1, Broadening Participation, is unchanged.
The deadline is moved from November to October.
Includes a new teaching option at the conclusion of the research and training plan.
Summary Of Program Requirements
General Information
Program Title:
National Plant Genome Initiative Postdoctoral Research Fellowships (NPGI Postdocs)
A joint NSF-USDA-DOE Program
Synopsis of Program:
The Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) awards Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology to recent recipients of the doctoral degree for research and training in selected areas supported by BIO and with special goals for human resource development in biology. The fellowships encourage independence at an early stage of the research career to permit Fellows to pursue their research and training goals in the most appropriate research locations regardless of the availability of funding for the Fellows at that site. For FY 2011, these BIO programs are (1) Broadening Participation in Biology and (2) Intersections of Biology and Mathematical and Physical Sciences. These areas change periodically as new scientific and infrastructure opportunities present themselves; and this solicitation will be changed as necessary to reflect the areas being funded. The fellowships are also designed to provide active mentoring of the Fellows by the sponsoring scientists who will benefit from having these talented young scientists in their research groups. The research and training plan of each fellowship must address important scientific questions within the scope of the BIO Directorate and the specific guidelines in this fellowship program solicitation. International and teaching options are also offered. Because the fellowships are offered only to postdoctoral scientists early in their careers, NSF encourages doctoral advisors to discuss the availability of BIO fellowships with their graduate students early in their doctoral programs. Fellowships are awards to individuals, not institutions, and are administered by the Fellows.
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
-
Carter Kimsey, telephone: (703) 292-8470, email: ckimsey@nsf.gov
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):
- 47.074 --- Biological Sciences
Award Information
Anticipated Type of Award: Fellowship
Estimated Number of Awards: 15 fellowships per year in each competition area contingent upon availability of funds.
Anticipated Funding Amount: $5 to $6 million each year
Eligibility Information
Proposals may only be submitted by the following:
Only individuals may apply. NSF postdoctoral fellowships are awards to individuals, and applications are submitted directly by applicants to NSF. However, applications must include sponsoring scientists' statements and the applicants must affiliate with institutions (e.g., colleges and universities, and privately-sponsored nonprofit institutes and museums, government agencies and laboratories, and, under special conditions, for-profit organizations) anywhere in the world.
Applicants must
be U.S. citizens (or nationals) or permanent residents of the United States (i.e., have a "green card") at deadline;
earn or plan to earn the doctoral degree in a scientific or mathematical field prior to the requested start date of the fellowship and have not accepted an academic appointment;
either currently be a graduate student or, at the deadline date, have served in a position requiring the doctoral degree for no more than 12 full time months since earning the degree;
must present a research and training plan that falls within the purview of BIO and includes the required information for the specific competition as described in this document;
select both a host institution and sponsoring scientists different from the doctoral degree and the current position;
not have received Federal funding of more than $20,000 as PI or co-PI (except graduate fellowships and doctoral dissertation improvement grants);
not have submitted the same project to another NSF program; AND
not be a named participant on any other proposal submitted to NSF, including regular research proposals, concurrent with the fellowship application, regardless of who is the named principal investigator.
If you fail to meet any eligibility criterion, your application will be returned without review.
Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:
Only individuals may apply. There is no limit on the number of applicants that an institution may host.
Limit on Number of Proposals per PI: 1
Applicants may submit only one fellowship application to BIO per fiscal year and may apply in no more than 2 successive years for all Postdoctoral Fellowships in Biology.
Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
- Letters of Intent: Not Applicable
- Preliminary Proposal Submission: Not Applicable
- Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: This solicitation contains information that deviates from the standard NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide, Part I: Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) proposal preparation guidelines. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
B. Budgetary Information
- Cost Sharing Requirements: Cost Sharing is not required under this solicitation.
- Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: Fellowships are awards to individuals and have an institutional allowance in lieu of indirect costs.
- Other Budgetary Limitations: Other budgetary limitations apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
C. Due Dates
- Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
October 19, 2010
October 11, 2011
Second Tuesday in October, Annually Thereafter
Proposal Review Information Criteria
Merit Review Criteria: National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review considerations apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Award Administration Information
Award Conditions: Additional award conditions apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Reporting Requirements: Additional reporting requirements apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
I. Introduction
BIO offers Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology to provide opportunities for scientists early in their careers who are ready to assume independence in their research efforts and to obtain training beyond their graduate education in preparation for scientific careers, to gain research experience under the sponsorship of established scientists, and to broaden their scientific horizons. Fellowships are further designed to assist new scientists to direct their research efforts beyond traditional disciplinary lines and to avail themselves of unique research resources, sites, and facilities, including foreign locations. Fellows must affiliate with appropriate research institutions and are expected to devote themselves full time to the fellowship activities for the duration of the fellowship. BIO selects areas of opportunity in biology for fellowship support in areas where human resources are needed to develop the newly emerging areas.
Currently BIO offers Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology in 2 areas:
Competitive Area 1. Broadening Participation in Biology.
These fellowships have been offered since FY 1990 as the NSF Minority Postdoctoral Research Fellowships to increase the participation of under-represented groups in biology. The program supports a wide range of biological research and training across the full range of BIO's research programs.
Competitive Area 2. Intersections of Biology and Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
The mathematical and physical sciences do not simply provide tools for studies in the biological sciences but present new opportunities to play a much more critical role in advancing biological research. Progress in biology requires new developments in the mathematical and physical sciences that lead to new theory and experimental techniques and opportunities for their integration into research approaches in biology. As research in biology becomes more interdisciplinary and requires more sophisticated modeling and experimental techniques, new connections need to be made between biology and the mathematical and physical sciences. To further advances in biology, these fellowships will support the most innovative research and training where biology meets the mathematical or physical sciences. To achieve this goal, the fellowships require dual mentors for the Fellow, one from biology and one from mathematical or physical sciences. Sponsors may be at the same or different institutions but must provide mentoring and research guidance from the different fields presented in the proposed research and training plan.
II. Program Description
Fellowship Competition Area 1: Broadening Participation in Biology
Through this program, BIO seeks to increase the diversity of scientists at the postdoctoral level in biology, and thereby contribute to the future vitality of the Nation's scientific enterprise. Groups that are significantly under represented in biology in the U.S. include Native Americans (including Alaskan Natives) and Native Pacific Islanders, African Americans, and Hispanics. Individuals with disabilities are also under represented. The goal of the program is to prepare minority biologists and others who share NSF's diversity goals for positions of scientific leadership in academia, industry, and government. The research and training plan in these applications must fall within the purview of the BIO Directorate and explain how the fellowship award will broaden or effectively encourage the broadening of participation of under-represented minorities in biology supported by BIO.
Fellowship Competition Area 2: Intersections of Biology and Mathematical and Physical Sciences. The purpose of these fellowships is to provide substantially broadening postdoctoral research and training opportunities to junior researchers who have conducted doctoral research in biology or physical and mathematical sciences and who present a research and training plan at the intersection of biology with mathematical and physical sciences. These fellowships require dual mentorship of the Fellow. The mentors must write one integrated statement that is part of the application. An applicant trained in biology must present a research and training plan to gain expertise, techniques, or knowledge in physical or mathematical sciences and apply it to research topics in biology. An applicant trained in physical or mathematical sciences must present a research and training plan using biological systems. The biological research proposed must fall within BIO's purview. Descriptions of research appropriate for NSF are found at https://www.nsf.gov/ under Funding Opportunities, Program Areas using the drop down menu. The goal of the fellowships is to provide an opportunity for cross-training to enhance the Fellow's ability to conduct integrative and interdisciplinary research.
General description of BIO Postdoctoral Fellowships
- Appropriateness for BIO and Program Priorities
A research and training plan whose focus falls within the scope of any of the core programs in the Directorate for the Biological Sciences (BIO) is eligible for support within each competitive area. Further restrictions may apply for particular postdoctoral competitions. Be aware: "Research with disease-related goals, including work on the etiology, diagnosis or treatment of physical or mental disease, abnormality, or malfunction in human beings or animals, is normally not supported. Animal models of such conditions or the development or testing of drugs or other procedures for their treatment also are not eligible for support." See NSF Grant Proposal Guide, https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg. While it is expected that research of fundamental biological significance may often have broader impacts to medicine, applications determined to have a clear biomedical focus will be returned without review. If your proposal mentions human disease, you should discuss its appropriateness with one of the listed Program Officers. Priority is given to research areas where BIO plays a unique or special role among NSF programs and total Federal funding. If your research is in an area of biology not primarily funded by BIO or if you are uncertain, you are strongly encouraged to call one of the BIO Program Officers to discuss the appropriateness of the research.
- Location of Work
Research and training supported by these fellowships may be conducted at any appropriate U.S. or foreign host institution. Appropriate institutions include colleges and universities, private nonprofit institutes and museums, and government installations and laboratories. Private and public for-profit organizations may be suitable if they provide an institutional contribution to cover the institutional and special allowances (see below) and do not place any intellectual property limitations on the Fellow’s activities. Because the objectives of the fellowships include broadening the perspectives and experiences of the Fellows and promoting interdisciplinary research careers, careful consideration should be given to the selection of the sponsoring scientists and host institutions.
BIO encourages Fellows to gain international experience by selecting foreign hosts for at least part of the tenure of the fellowship. Applicants who plan to spend more than one year of the fellowship in a sponsoring laboratory overseas may request a 3-year fellowship that may include the final year at a U.S. laboratory after the foreign tenure. Both the foreign and U.S. locations must be included in the sponsoring scientist statement in the application.
- The Sponsoring Scientist(s)
The Fellow must affiliate with a host institution(s) at all times during the entire tenure of the fellowship and select a sponsoring scientist(s) who will provide mentoring and guidance with both the research and training proposed by the applicant. The applicant is responsible for making prior arrangements with the host institution and sponsoring scientist(s). Regardless of the number of sponsors or locations, the fellowship application requires a single sponsoring scientist statement. When more than one sponsor is proposed, one must be named lead sponsor and information from all must be integrated into a single statement. Likewise, if more than one site is proposed, the sponsoring scientist statement must integrate all sponsors and locations in a single statement. Because of the increasingly important intersections of other fields with biology, it is expected that dual sponsorship will be common and it is required for fellowships at the intersection of biology and physical sciences. An important basis for judging the suitability of the host institution is the degree to which the sponsoring scientist statement describes and offers a research environment and mentoring plan that could not be provided without fellowship support.
If a fellowship is offered, the applicant may be requested to provide documentation from the host institution that the terms and conditions of the fellowship are acceptable and that the Fellow will be provided adequate mentoring, space, basic services, needed resources, and supplies. Once an application is submitted, any changes in location or sponsorship for the fellowship must be approved in advance by BIO.
- Teaching Option for Undergraduate Education
Applicants to either of the competitive areas supported by this program solicitation may include a plan for up to an additional year of support during which the Fellow would gain experience in teaching at the undergraduate level and receive mentoring in teaching effectiveness in undergraduate settings. The teaching option is intended to be taken up following the completion of the research and training plan but may be requested at other times with the concurrence of the sponsoring scientist(s).
BIO recognizes the importance of developing effective teaching skills of future undergraduate biology faculty as a means to foster improvements in undergraduate biology education nationally. The discipline of biology has changed dramatically in the last several decades, owing to significant discoveries, an explosion of biological information, and recent technological advances that have transformed the way biologists conduct research. New discoveries in cognitive sciences have lead also to improved understanding of how students learn. Simultaneous with these scientific advances, students who are interested in studying biology increasingly wish to be engaged in course experiences that are relevant to pressing societal challenges, such as global change, and sustainability. These contextual factors challenge us to consider the nature of undergraduate biology education, and have resulted in a national dialog and growing consensus about the need to improve undergraduate biology education. These issues were the subject of a recent meeting of undergraduate biology education stakeholders. A summary of recommendations from that meeting may be found in the report Vision and Change: A Call to Action.
Project plans should reflect acknowledgement of the significant numbers of non-majors as well as majors undergraduate students who enroll in biology courses, and that these students have diverse aspirations and career goals. Plans should focus on professional skills development in one or more of the following areas:
Articulation of student learning goals that are focused on conceptual understanding of core concepts in biology
Teaching approaches based on an understanding of current knowledge of how students learn
Effective use of assessment of student learning, and evaluation of the results to adjust instructional approaches to be able to improve student learning continuously
The most competitive projects will include opportunities for Fellows to teach and to receive mentoring in teaching effectiveness, and such training need not be restricted to the institution where the research component of the fellowship occurred. However, the option aimed at developing pedagogical skills is not intended to disrupt progress on research efforts completely. Most welcome are creative plans in which the Fellow gains experience in teaching, is mentored in becoming an effective teacher, and continues to make progress on research aims.
III. Award Information
- Duration and Tenure
The fellowship tenure for Area 1, broadening participation, is normally 36 continuous months. The fellowship tenure for Area 2 is normally 24 continuous months except when the Fellow spends more than a year abroad. In this case, the original application may request a 36-month tenure. Both fellowships can also include the teaching option for up to an additional 12 months. The budget for the teaching option will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis. Tenure begins on the first of the month only and may commence at the Fellow's request between June 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. Interruptions in tenure or extensions without additional cost to NSF are permitted only for extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the Fellow. Fellowships are not renewable.
- Stipend and Allowances
For the basic fellowship (without exercising a teaching option), the total fellowship amount is $60,000 for year 1: $63,000 for year 2, and $66,000 for year 3 and consists of three types of payments. The stipend is $45,000 for year 1, $48,000 for year 2, and $51,000 for year 3 paid monthly at the rate of $3,750/$4,000/$4,250, respectively. The teaching option budget will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis and may carry a monthly stipend of up to $4,500 if paid during a fourth year. All payments are made directly to the Fellow as an electronic funds transfer into a personal account at a financial institution. A research allowance of $10,000 per year is paid as a lump sum to the Fellow at the beginning of the Fellowship in the same manner for expenses directly related to the conduct of the research, such as materials and supplies, subscription fees and recovery costs for databases, travel, and publication expenses. An institutional allowance of $5,000 per year is paid to the host institution for fringe benefits, including health insurance, and for expenses incurred in support of the Fellow, such as space, equipment, and general-purpose supplies. There are no allowances for dependents or travel separate from these two allowances.
The fellowship amount can be increased to include a Facilitation Award for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) and joint funding with the International Research Fellowship Program (IRFP) but otherwise cannot be increased or supplemented. When requesting FASED and IRFP funding, applicants should contact the BIO Postdoctoral Fellowship Program prior to applying.
Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: Fellowships are awards to individuals and have an institutional allowance in lieu of indirect costs.
- Cost Sharing is not required in applications submitted under this Program Solicitation.
IV. Eligibility Information
Proposals may only be submitted by the following:
Only individuals may apply. NSF postdoctoral fellowships are awards to individuals, and applications are submitted directly by applicants to NSF. However, applications must include sponsoring scientists' statements and the applicants must affiliate with institutions (e.g., colleges and universities, and privately-sponsored nonprofit institutes and museums, government agencies and laboratories, and, under special conditions, for-profit organizations) anywhere in the world.
Applicants must
be U.S. citizens (or nationals) or permanent residents of the United States (i.e., have a "green card") at deadline;
earn or plan to earn the doctoral degree in a scientific or mathematical field prior to the requested start date of the fellowship and have not accepted an academic appointment;
either currently be a graduate student or, at the deadline date, have served in a position requiring the doctoral degree for no more than 12 full time months since earning the degree;
must present a research and training plan that falls within the purview of BIO and includes the required information for the specific competition as described in this document;
select both a host institution and sponsoring scientists different from the doctoral degree and the current position;
not have received Federal funding of more than $20,000 as PI or co-PI (except graduate fellowships and doctoral dissertation improvement grants);
not have submitted the same project to another NSF program; AND
not be a named participant on any other proposal submitted to NSF, including regular research proposals, concurrent with the fellowship application, regardless of who is the named principal investigator.
If you fail to meet any eligibility criterion, your application will be returned without review.
Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:
Only individuals may apply. There is no limit on the number of applicants that an institution may host.
Limit on Number of Proposals per PI: 1
Applicants may submit only one fellowship application to BIO per fiscal year and may apply in no more than 2 successive years for all Postdoctoral Fellowships in Biology.
V. Proposal Preparation And Submission Instructions
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
Full Proposal Instructions: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the guidelines specified in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF website at:
https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg. Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-PUBS (7827) or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov.
Include all the requested information and documentation and include only what is specifically requested. Page limits include pictures, figures, tables, graphics, etc. Proposals that do not conform to these requirements and all page limitations will be returned without review. You will not be given a chance to shorten and resubmit the proposal. Proposals must be submitted electronically via the NSF FastLane system. Only complete and timely applications will be accepted; non-compliant applications will be returned without review as will those that are incomplete or late.
Preparing your fellowship application is different in several ways from preparing a research proposal:
-
Do not submit your proposal through a sponsored projects office at your home or host institution; you are submitting the proposal as an individual. You must first register as an individual researcher before you or your references can gain access to the application and reference procedures. To use FastLane, go to the NSF Web site https://www.nsf.gov/ and select "FastLane" or directly to the FastLane home page http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/. Click on the Postdoctoral Fellowships tab. Click on applicant, then select Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology. Then click on "How to apply" for complete step-by-step instructions.
-
A complete FastLane submitted proposal requires materials from you (the applicant), a statement and CV from your sponsoring scientist(s), and 2 reference letters (one from the doctoral thesis advisor).
-
The information needed from the sponsoring scientist(s) is similarly found on the FastLane homepage after answering "sponsoring scientist" to the "Who are you?" question. This information must be uploaded into the application.
-
Your references enter their materials directly into FastLane from the FastLane homepage.
-
FastLane allows fellowship applicants and referees to work on parts of the application and to save them for future completion and submission.
Your sponsoring scientists and referees should go to the FastLane home page, click on the postdoctoral fellowships tab, then answer the "Who are you" question before selecting Postdoctoral Fellowships in Biology.
In FastLane, a complete fellowship application consists of:
-
the application form (this form is unique to fellowships and can only be accessed in FastLane by following the directions as described herein. Applications in which the form is incomplete will be returned without review. Write in None or N/A if you have no information to provide for some of the items);
-
applicant's Curriculum Vitae (CV) limited to 2 pages (list publications and abstracts separately);
-
an abstract or project summary (limited to one page) of the proposed research and training including a specific and separate statement of broader impacts. See Section VI. A. below for guidance from the National Science Board on broader impacts. If the abstract fails to include a clear, specific and clearly differentiated statement of broader impacts beyond the scientific ones, the proposal will be returned without review. If you are applying to competitive area #2, intersections of biology and mathematical and physical sciences, you must also include a clear and concise statement of the intersection, the mentor from biology, and the mentor identified by field of mathematical or physical science;
-
research and training plan (limited to 5 pages, including all figures, tables, etc.) with its own bibliography (no page limit);
-
abstract of your dissertation research (limited to one page);
-
if the teaching option is being requested, the project plan (limited to 3 pages) may be uploaded as a "supplemental document" in the FastLane application;
-
the sponsoring scientist(s) statement and 2-page CV(s) that you, the applicant, uploads into the application; and
-
two reference reports, submitted directly in FastLane by the reference writers.
Guidance on the research and training plan:
The research and training plan presents the research that you will conduct and the training that you will receive during the fellowship period and how they relate to your career goals. Include in the research and training plan: 1) a brief and informative introduction or background section; 2) a statement of research objectives, methods, and significance; 3) training objectives and plan for achieving them (these may include scientific as well as other career preparation activities); 4) an explanation of how the fellowship activities will enhance your career development; and 5) a justification of the choice of sponsoring scientist(s) and host institution(s). As with all NSF proposals, broader impacts must also be addressed.
Some applications may require other documentation before the final decision can be made, e.g., animal care and use, human subjects, government permits, letters of collaboration, and commitments from private sources. Their existence should be noted in the research and training plan, but they should not be included in the application. NSF may request them later.
Guidance on the Sponsoring Scientist(s) Statement:
The sponsoring scientist(s) statement is meant to show how the proposed host(s) and host institution(s) provide the best environment for the Fellow's proposed research and training plan and form the basis for a future independent research career. Therefore, it should include a specific mentoring plan, a description of how the Fellow's independence will be nurtured, and what aspects of the project, if any, cannot go when the Fellow leaves. Regardless of the number of sponsors, one integrated statement must be developed and submitted. If the Fellow plans to teach as part of career development activities, the Fellow is limited to teaching in a course taught by the sponsoring scientist(s) or as part of a course directly related to the Fellow's doctoral or fellowship research project. The sponsoring scientist(s) statement must detail the mentoring that the Fellow will receive on teaching if applicable. Sponsors are not expected to provide all the mentoring themselves and may call on all resources available on campus or through other organizations, e.g., professional societies, postdoctoral offices, etc.
Reminder: A complete sponsoring scientist statement consists of two parts; a CV of no more than two pages for each sponsor and a single discussion of the following items:
-
A brief description of the research projects in the host research group(s), including a statement of current and pending research support, both private and public, for each sponsor. If any sponsor has submitted similar research for funding, what is the degree of overlap?
-
An explanation of how the research and training plan of the applicant would fit into and complement ongoing research of the sponsor(s) and indicate the personnel with whom the Fellow would work.
-
How the sponsor(s) will determine what mentoring the applicant needs in research, teaching, and career development skills and translate these into a specific plan to foster the development of the applicant's future independent research career.
-
What role the sponsor(s) will play in the proposed research and training and what other resources will be available to the Fellow to complete his or her training plan during the fellowship.
-
What limitations, if any, will be placed on the Fellow regarding the research following the fellowship.
You upload the sponsoring scientist statement into your application as a "supplementary document" in FastLane.
For both competitive areas 1 and 2, your application must also include the two references as listed on your application form. One should be your thesis advisor. Do not use your sponsoring scientist as a reference. Your references will need your FastLane-assigned temporary proposal number and a password that you assign. FastLane permits you to send them an email with this information or you can provide it to them directly. They must change the password the first time they login to the reference module. They complete a reference form in FastLane, upload a recommendation letter, and then submit the reference.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program solicitation number (NSF 10-587) in the program solicitation block on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
B. Budgetary Information
Cost Sharing: Cost sharing is not required under this solicitation.
Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations:Fellowships are awards to individuals and have an institutional allowance in lieu of indirect costs.
Other Budgetary Limitations:
The fellowship award amount is set for all fellowships based on the duration of the award. FastLane generates the budget; applicants do not need to enter any budget information. The research and training plan should make clear the requested duration.
C. Due Dates
- Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
October 19, 2010
October 11, 2011
Second Tuesday in October, Annually Thereafter
D. FastLane Requirements
Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this program solicitation through use of the NSF FastLane system. Detailed instructions regarding the technical aspects of proposal preparation and submission via FastLane are available at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications). The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Further instructions regarding this process are available on the FastLane Website at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/fastlane.jsp.
VI. NSF Proposal Processing And Review Procedures
Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate NSF program where they will be reviewed if they meet NSF proposal preparation requirements. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to suggest names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the proposal.
A. NSF Merit Review Criteria
All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board (NSB)-approved merit review criteria: intellectual merit and the broader impacts of the proposed effort. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.
The two NSB-approved merit review criteria are listed below. The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which the reviewer is qualified to make judgements.
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
Examples illustrating activities likely to demonstrate broader impacts are available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/broaderimpacts.pdf.
Mentoring activities provided to postdoctoral researchers supported on the project, as described in the Sponsoring Scientist(s) Statement, will be evaluated under the Broader Impacts criterion.
NSF staff also will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions:
Integration of Research and Education
One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives.Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.
Additional Review Criteria:
Applicants are evaluated on their ability and accomplishments as evidenced by the submitted CV. The research and training plan is evaluated on its scientific merit, its feasibility, its significance in generating new biological knowledge, and its impact on the career development of the applicant. Other important evaluative factors are the suitability and availability of the sponsoring scientist(s) and host institution(s), including colleagues and facilities.
For competitive area #2, Intersections of Biology and Mathematical and Physical Sciences, applications may first be screened by NSF program officers for the potential for cross-training that promises to enhance the applicant's ability to conduct integrative or interdisciplinary research. Project summaries (abstracts) must clearly describe the intersection of biology with one of the mathematical or physical sciences and must identify the mentor who is the biologist and the mathematician or physical scientist who is the other mentor. If the potential for cross-training is judged insufficient, the applicant will be notified and given the basis for the determination. The application will be returned as not responsive to the program solicitation.
B. Review and Selection Process
Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review, or Internal NSF Review.
Applications will be checked for compliance with the requirements of this program solicitation. Non-conforming, late, and incomplete applications will be returned without review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF is striving to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.
VII. Award Administration Information
A. Notification of the Award
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.)
B. Award Conditions
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1); * or Research Terms and Conditions * and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative agreements also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at
https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov.
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Award & Administration Guide (AAG) Chapter II, available electronically on the NSF Website at
https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=aag.
Special Award Conditions:The fellowship award is made to the individual, not the institution. Payments (except the institutional allowance) are made to the individual. Awards cannot be extended without prior NSF approval. Pre-award costs are not permitted.
C. Reporting Requirements
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards require more frequent project reports). Within 90 days after expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final project report, and a project outcomes report for the general public.
Failure to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for that PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through FastLane, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. Such reports provide information on activities and findings, project participants (individual and organizational) publications; and, other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system. Submission of the report via FastLane constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report must be prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI.
Additional Reporting Requirements:
Applicants must file termination certificates (this form will be provided by the NSF program office) in addition to annual and final technical reports.
VIII. Agency Contacts
General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:
-
Carter Kimsey, telephone: (703) 292-8470, email: ckimsey@nsf.gov
For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact:
- FastLane Help Desk, telephone: 1-800-673-6188; e-mail: fastlane@nsf.gov.
IX. Other Information
The NSF Website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. Use of this Website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, National Science Foundation Update is a free e-mail subscription service designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Regional Grants Conferences. Subscribers are informed through e-mail when new publications are issued that match their identified interests. Users can subscribe to this service by clicking the "Get NSF Updates by Email" link on the NSF web site.
Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this new mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may be obtained at http://www.grants.gov.
About The National Science Foundation
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in all fields of science and engineering."
NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic research.
NSF receives approximately 40,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities to work on NSF-supported projects. See Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II, Section D.2 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
The National Science Foundation Information Center may be reached at (703) 292-5111.
|
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov
|
Privacy Act And Public Burden Statements
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding applicants or nominees as part of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another Federal agency, court, or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records, " 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0023. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 12 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Suzanne H. Plimpton
Reports Clearance Officer
Division of Administrative Services
National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA 22230
